61 Heated Rivalry icons
Mar. 13th, 2026 08:52 pm- 32 Shane Hollander/Ilya Rozanov
- 15 Ilya Rozanov
- 11 Shane Hollander
- 2 Svetlana Vetrova
- 1 Scott Hunter/Kip Grady
Preview:

Here @

1-3
4-6
Or whatever. This is clearly my week for being Grumpy Archivist.
Have been solicited to review article for journal with which I have had a long connection, following a recent backstory I will not go into.
But anyway, I have been asked to review it, and it is definitely Within My Purlieu -
Perhaps too much so, because on opening the document to check that it in fact was, the person sending it having given me no indication of what it was about -
Discovered it was based upon an archive with which I had a significant history.
And no, the fact that there is this beautiful and fairly substantial archive in lovely curated order available to the researcher is a lot less down to the creating body (okay, I will give them points for the stuff actually having survived in fairly good nick) than to the work of archivists over 2-3 decades acquiring the material (in batches as it turned up during office moves and so on), sorting it into some kind of coherent order, and cataloguing it.
A saga which is actually recounted in the online catalogue to the collection, not to mention an article wot I writ about the organisation in question.
It is actually a pretty cool organisation, compared to some I have had dealings with, but superior archive processing, not really in their skill-set.
Grump. Will try and make tactful point about acknowledging the labour of archivists....
***
We may recall the saga of the tech bro whose sprog did not want the AI teddy he had acquired for her to talk back, and turned the speech facility off, his head around this he could not get -
And this is very creepy, no lessons have been learnt: AI toys for children misread emotions and respond inappropriately, researchers warn:
The parents in the study were interested in the toy's potential to teach language and communication skills.
However, their children frequently struggled to converse with it. Gabbo didn't hear their interruptions, talked over them, could not differentiate between child and adult voices and responded awkwardly to declarations of affection.
When one five-year-old said, "I love you," to the toy, it replied: "As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided. Let me know how you would like to proceed."
The concern is that at a developmental stage where children are learning about social interaction and cues, generative AI output could be confusing.
(Video ID: a white person with short reddish hair and gold-rimmed glasses sits before a bookshelf and speaks. /end ID)
Transcript: How do you feel, given Duck Prints Press’s mission statement and origin, about publishing books that are proudly “serial number filed off” fanfiction?
So, for people who aren’t familiar with that term, it just means somebody took a fanfic and, like, used find-and-replace to change the characters names and now are marketing it as original fiction. So if it was, I don’t know, Castiel and Dean – to use my own example – not that I’ve filed off serial numbers but I have written a lot of Destiel – then, you know, maybe Dean becomes some guy named Mitch, and Cas becomes, you know, Richard, and Mitch and Richard have their romance for the ages.
In this “original work,” how do I feel about it? I think it depends. I think it can be well done. I certainly – I don’t wanna name names, but I’ve been in fandom long enough that I know of major published works that were fanfic that are not widely known to have been fanfic and are very popular and are not getting, the, “oh, it’s got the serial numbers filed off, it’s bad.”
I think, just like most kinds of writings, it can be well done, it can be poorly done. I know as an author, at a point when I was having trouble making words on original work, I would write – I mostly write alternative universes, often very very far from the founding material. And part of the reason I did that was with the expectation that someday I would file the serial numbers off my own work. And it’s relatively easy to do when it’s very far from canon. That said, I think needs to be more than just a find-and-replace.
There’s things that work in fanfiction that won’t make sense if it’s an original fiction. If it’s poorly done, if those things aren’t changed, then it’s gonna read like fanfiction even if – you know – every will know, if I – I used Dean and Castiel as an example. If Dean – I mean if Mitch is still a monster hunter, and Richard is still an angel of the lord, it’s going to be pretty damn obvious that it was Supernatural fanfic, and that’s not necessarily gonna be that entertaining for people to read if they’re not interested in the fandom.
On the other hand, you know, I know of a Dean/Cas work that got remade as femslash – as sapphic – and completely rewritten. It’s a completely different book now even tho it has the same basic story and that’s bad in and of itself. So, what I think about it is – it really depends.
I think when they lean-in on that part for the marketing, though, that’s a little awkward. I feel like if any fan author did what tradpub is doing with “it’s actually Dramione” which is the ship for Draco Malfoy and Hermione. Or, you know, this was very clearly Reylo – which is Kylo Ren and Rey from Star Wars. Like… if any of us did that, we’d get our butts sued off. And it’s a little obnoxious to see places that are bigger than us taking advantage of that part of fandom culture in a way that fans never actually could. And that’s quite aside from whether or not they’re good books or bad books, because I think trying to say it’s okay when they’re good and it’s bad when they’re bad is actually not maybe the best framework for it.
But, yeah, sorry, I could keep going. I have strong opinions about fandom stuff. Basically, I think it can be done well. I think it can be done poorly. I don’t love the way it’s being marketed.
This is an Ask Me Anything. I’m Claire, the owner of Duck Prints Press. Hit me up if you have any questions!
Springer Nature has launched a new agriculture journal under the troubled Cureus brand. As part of its launch, the publisher invited at least one researcher with irrelevant specialities to join its editorial board, Retraction Watch has learned.
The new journal comes after Clarivate’s Web of Science delisting the original and long-embattled Cureus Journal of Medical Science in October for concerns about article quality.
The flagship Cureus was founded in 2009 by John Adler Jr., a Stanford University neurosurgeon, as an open-access journal for clinicians who didn’t have grants. Springer Nature acquired the journal in December 2022. In 2024, the publisher launched Cureus Journals — open-access journals on engineering, computer science and business — using the brand name.
On November 15, the journal sent a sensory biologist an invitation to “apply for a position on our esteemed Editorial Board as an Associate Editor” for its latest addition, the Cureus Journal of Agriculture and Food Science.
“Your expertise in agriculture and food science is highly regarded, and your research contributions have significantly advanced the field,” the email reads. Springer Nature launched the new journal in December, and its editorial board is currently comprised of five scientists, one each from Brazil, USA, Jamaica, Turkey and China, according to the journal’s webpage.
Four days after sending the invite, Springer Nature sent an email noting the invitation “was mistakenly delivered to individuals outside its intended audience due to a system glitch,” the email reads.
A spokesperson from the new journal told us CJFS was “editorially independent and separate” from the Cureus Journal of Medical Science. “As with the launch of any new journal, it was developed over a period of time in response to clear demand from the research communities we serve, providing a focused venue underpinned by robust quality controls.”
The researcher who received the email asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation, but called the request “troubling.”
“I’ve invested a lot of time, effort, and public money publishing papers and book chapters through Springer and the value of this investment crashes if readers don’t trust that all of this work has been vetted by qualified reviewers and editors,” the researcher told us.
Cureus promotes its speedy publication but has been criticized for publishing low-quality studies and hosting “channels” that allow questionable organizations to hand-pick their own editors. In August, Cureus eliminated author suggestions for peer reviewers in an attempt to decrease potential conflicts of interest.
Cureus’ publication rate has remained steady since they were delisted, but the loss of a journal’s impact factor has historically meant researchers are less likely to submit manuscripts to the periodical.
Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on X or Bluesky, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at team@retractionwatch.com.
Quick haul post heehee. Our local Daiso had MHA blind bag merch (?!?!) and my partner let me get at least one of everything they had except the stickers and the acrylic keychain. It seems like the collab was released in 2025 based on this tweet, and it took a year before my country got it on our shelves. I mean, I never even knew our local Daisos had anime stuff. Usually, it's just Sanrio. I'm guessing these are leftovers, though? Lol.
( 285 words )